Re: Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Riaan van den Dool <rvddool(at)csir(dot)co(dot)za>, Brett Walker <brett(dot)walker(at)geometryit(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems
Date: 2012-07-25 18:45:44
Message-ID: CAHyXU0wS9V_k70gEMA7qGCL3nOvZE58TSTuz0W6hXSFEgBdD6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This may be another issue of the problem discussed here:
> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/avoid-prepared-statements-on-complex-queries-td4996363.html
> (Kris Jurka explains the crux of it in that thread).
>
> Note that it seems the preparing/planning interaction was not the
> poster's actual problem, but it may have been yours. As Tom Lane notes
> in that thread, this should get better in 9.2.

jdbc should get some blame too -- it's really aggressive about
preparing queries.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vinicius Abrahao 2012-07-25 19:17:38 Re: Geoserver-PostGIS performance problems
Previous Message Marcus Engene 2012-07-25 18:11:55 Re: odd planner again, pg 9.0.8