Re: LWLOCK_STATS

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LWLOCK_STATS
Date: 2012-01-10 14:10:01
Message-ID: CAHyXU0w4YLcTE20VyJE8dROZMrhR-qsC9G+6G4xPFp47RpzsCQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> So benchmarking write-heavy workloads and separately benchmarking
> read-only workloads is more representative.

Absolutely. High write activity applications are much more difficult
to optimize with simple tricks like client side caching. Also,
storage is finally moving out of the dark ages so that high write
transaction rate servers are no longer necessarily i/o bound without
on reasonable hardware.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-01-10 14:28:58 Re: pgsql: plpython: Add SPI cursor support
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2012-01-10 14:04:56 Re: pgsphere