Thank you.

Cheers,
WBL
Op 27 jun. 2012 14:59 schreef "Ants Aasma" <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at> het volgende:

> On Jun 27, 2012 2:29 PM, "Willy-Bas Loos" <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Should i use a larger shared_buffers for the other cluster(s) too, so
> that i bypass the inefficient OS file-cache?
>
> Once the in-memory cluster has filled its shared buffers, the pages go
> cold for the OS cache and get replaced with pages of other clusters that
> are actually referenced.
>
> Ants Aasma
>

In response to

• Re: [PERFORM] [performance] fast reads on a busy server at 2012-06-27 12:58:22 from Ants Aasma

pgsql-performance by date

Next:	From: Merlin Moncure	Date: 2012-06-27 16:49:02
	Subject: Re: Can I do better than this heapscan and sort?
Previous:	From: Ants Aasma	Date: 2012-06-27 12:58:22
	Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [performance] fast reads on a busy server

pgsql-cluster-hackers by date

Next:	From: Adam Crews	Date: 2012-07-19 20:56:48
	Subject: postgres 9 bind address for replication
Previous:	From: Ants Aasma	Date: 2012-06-27 12:58:22
	Subject: Re: [PERFORM] [performance] fast reads on a busy server