Hi,

I've read this:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Prioritizing_databases_by_separating_into_multiple_clusters

But it doesn't really say anything about memory.
If i can fit an extra cluster into it's shared buffer, it should have fast
reads, right?
Even if i don't have seperate spindles and the disks are busy.
This is on a Debain server, postgres 8.4

Cheers,

WBL
-- 
"Quality comes from focus and clarity of purpose" -- Mark Shuttleworth

Responses

• Re: [performance] fast reads on a busy server at 2012-06-27 07:34:16 from Hannu Krosing

pgsql-performance by date

Next:	From: Hannu Krosing	Date: 2012-06-27 07:34:16
	Subject: Re: [performance] fast reads on a busy server
Previous:	From: Merlin Moncure	Date: 2012-06-26 13:42:34
	Subject: Re: Can I do better than this heapscan and sort?

pgsql-cluster-hackers by date

Next:	From: Hannu Krosing	Date: 2012-06-27 07:34:16
	Subject: Re: [performance] fast reads on a busy server
Previous:	From: Josh Berkus	Date: 2012-05-11 18:21:35
	Subject: Agenda For 3rd Cluster Hackers Summit, May 15th in Ottawa