Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Java 1.4

From: Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: Steven Schlansker <stevenschlansker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Java 1.4
Date: 2012-01-24 17:53:37
Message-ID: CAH_hXRbe94g7J3ye0c09+9S9ERUUNm6bLmMSuawzLno0HjQ_Zg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
> It occurs to me that if we move to git then we can keep two branches
> active. One branch would support 1.4 for backpatches and the other
> branch would drop 1.4 support and new features would be developed on
> that line.

I assume you mean that 9.2 would have a "split" release (separate 1.4
support) and all the older active release branches would remain with a
single 1.4-compatible version and have backpatches from the new
1.4-compatible branch? That could work, but for what it's worth, I
think the best way to do this would be to drop 1.4 compatibility
entirely in the mainline development branch (e.g., with 9.2 the first
non-1.4-compatible release; I'd love to talk to anyone planning to
talk to 9.2 from Java 1.4), and keep all the existing release branches
compatible until we drop support.

---
Maciek Sakrejda | System Architect | Truviso

1065 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 215
Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 242-3500 Main
www.truviso.com

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2012-01-24 17:54:50
Subject: Re: Java 1.4
Previous:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2012-01-24 17:52:41
Subject: Re: Java 1.4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group