On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 29 July 2012 16:01, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Attached patch changes the startup process so that it creates .done file
>>> whenever WAL file is successfully restored, whether archive mode is
>>> enabled or not. The restored WAL files will not be archived again because
>>> of .done file.
>>
>> The proposed patch works, for archiving only, but I don't like the
>> code. It's a partial refactoring of existing code.
>>
>> I prefer to go for a full re-factoring version for HEAD, and a zero
>> refactoring version for 9.2 since we're deep into beta.

Isn't it time to push the full re-factoring version to HEAD? If there is no
such version yet, what about pushing the zero refactoring version for now?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao

In response to

• Re: Prevent restored WAL files from being archived again Re: Unnecessary WAL archiving after failover at 2012-08-10 17:19:42 from Fujii Masao

Responses

• Re: Prevent restored WAL files from being archived again Re: Unnecessary WAL archiving after failover at 2012-10-02 18:11:03 from Simon Riggs

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Pavel Stehule	Date: 2012-10-02 18:08:26
	Subject: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log
Previous:	From: Noah Misch	Date: 2012-10-02 17:58:40
	Subject: Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points