On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> ISTM that writing an invalid-page table to the disk for every restartpoints is
>> better approach.
> I still say that's uncalled-for overkill. The invalid-page table is not
> necessary for recovery, it's only a debugging cross-check.
If so, there is no risk even if the invalid-page table is lost and the check
is skipped unexpectedly?
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Brar Piening||Date: 2011-09-27 05:49:58|
|Subject: Re: Support UTF-8 files with BOM in COPY FROM|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-09-27 04:11:39|
|Subject: Re: random isolation test failures |