On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> PrimaryKeepaliveMessage is a message type that uses WalSndrMessage.
>>> That message type is only sent when the WalSndr is quiet, so what is
>>> the difference, in that case?
>>
>> Oh, you are right. There is no difference.
>
> Here are the changes we discussed. Further comments before commit?

Can you add the test for avoiding useless call of GetReplicationApplyDelay()
and GetReplicationTransferLatency()?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

• Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Send new protocol keepalive messages to standby servers. at 2012-01-12 19:19:54 from Simon Riggs

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: YAMAMOTO Takashi	Date: 2012-01-13 04:24:12
	Subject: gistVacuumUpdate
Previous:	From: Nick Roosevelt	Date: 2012-01-13 04:07:04
	Subject: Postgres ReviewFest Patch: URI connection string support for libpq

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2012-01-13 13:01:05
	Subject: pgsql: Minor but necessary improvements to WAL keepalives
Previous:	From: Alex Hunsaker	Date: 2012-01-13 02:28:22
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix breakage from earlier plperl fix.