On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> That's an option. But I don't think that finding an existing file is so serious
> The recommendation should be that the archived files are never
> overwritten because that prevents a huge range of data loss bugs and
> kills them stone dead.
I'm OK with that default behavior of the executable. It's helpful if
supports overwrite-if-filesize-is-not-16MB option.
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2011-09-08 08:36:38|
|Previous:||From: daveg||Date: 2011-09-08 06:35:29|
|Subject: Re: FATAL: lock AccessShareLock on object 0/1260/0 is already held|