On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> wrote:
>>
>>
>> --On 15. Januar 2012 02:50:00 -0500 Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Attached is a patch thats implements a pg_stat_recovery view that
>>> keeps counters about processed wal records. I just notice that it
>>> still lacks documentation but i will add it during the week.
>>
>>
>> Hi Jaime,
>>
>> do you have an updated patch? The current v1 patch doesn't apply cleanly
>> anymore, and before i go and rebase the patch i thought i'm asking...
>>
>
> here's the patch rebased to this morning's HEAD

Before reviewing the patch, I'd like to know: what's the purpose of this view?
It's only debug purpose? ISTM that most users don't care about this view at all.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

• Re: pg_stats_recovery view at 2012-01-26 21:01:58 from Jaime Casanova

Responses

• Re: pg_stats_recovery view at 2012-02-02 07:26:26 from Jaime Casanova

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Shigeru Hanada	Date: 2012-02-02 02:32:03
	Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Previous:	From: Ashutosh Bapat	Date: 2012-02-02 01:56:18
	Subject: Re: Confusing EXPLAIN output in case of inherited tables