| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup --xlog compatibility break |
| Date: | 2012-06-12 17:33:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwEW+7_=DWqwPUQDzMTsSL=GWwK4m4gKfUxgN0AnMZC5Sg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On sön, 2012-06-10 at 13:43 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> > On tis, 2012-05-29 at 22:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> >> Yeah, good arguments all around, i agree too :-) Next question is -
>> >> suggestions for naming of said paramter?
>> >
>> > --xlog-method=something? And/or -Xsomething, which would automatically
>> > enable -x?
>>
>> How's this?
>
> I wouldn't make -x and -X exclusive. The way I understood this is, -x
> means include xlog, and -X says how to.
And we can specify -X without -x like -Z and -z option of pg_basebackup?
If no, I disagree with you because I don't want to specify two options to
use log streaming method.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2012-06-12 17:49:11 | Re: pg_basebackup blocking all queries with horrible performance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-12 17:31:05 | Re: 9.3: load path to mitigate load penalty for checksums |