From:
Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:
Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Cc:
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:
Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup()
Date:
2012-02-03 04:21:11
Message-ID:
CAHGQGwEE5Zk05cPeTVWjd+TYce10zemMs_Li7ekkroiFKPj9kw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2012-01-30 18:33:53 from Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>
2012-01-30 21:14:05 from Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
2012-01-31 09:57:42 from Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>
2012-02-02 11:23:02 from Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
2012-02-02 11:44:01 from Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-02-02 17:47:35 from Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>
2012-02-02 23:00:41 from Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
2012-02-02 23:06:16 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2012-02-03 02:31:43 from Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
2012-02-03 04:21:11 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-02-03 09:10:11 from Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
2012-02-03 09:47:55 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-02-03 09:52:09 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2012-02-03 09:55:42 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-03-02 15:05:20 from Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>
2012-03-31 12:25:51 from Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)it>
2012-04-03 12:21:55 from Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>
2012-05-02 17:53:21 from Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)it>
2012-05-15 00:52:32 from Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>
2012-06-14 09:36:19 from Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>
2012-06-14 10:06:54 from Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)it>
2012-06-14 17:29:31 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-06-14 17:48:00 from Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-06-14 18:02:43 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-06-14 19:10:21 from Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-06-14 19:20:49 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-06-14 19:36:12 from Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-06-14 18:05:48 from Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
2012-06-14 18:32:21 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
<euler(at)timbira(dot)com> wrote:
> On 02-02-2012 20:06, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> If there is more than one concurrent backup running, which one do you
>> return? The first one or the latest one? Or perhaps you need an
>> interface thta can return them all...
>>
> IMHO, pg_is_in_backup() should return true if one or more backup copies are
> running. As about returning the backup timestamp, we could return an array
> like array[['label_1', '2012-01-28 02:00:01 BRST'], ['label_2', '2012-01-28
> 03:40:34 BRST']] or NULL if none.
It seems to be more user-friendly to introduce a view like pg_stat_backup
rather than the function returning an array.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-02-03 04:48:46Subject : Re: Hot standby fails if any backend crashes Previous :From : Kyotaro HORIGUCHIDate : 2012-02-03 04:01:11Subject : Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage
