| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Jun Ishiduka <ishizuka(dot)jun(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca, cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |
| Date: | 2011-09-26 12:12:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwE=q8kHPUTvXe-aSutUkZCzNKMNvk7-d2388zHUh2_RXg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Would it make sense for pg_start_backup() to have the ability to wait
> for the next restartpoint in a case like this, if we know that FPW has
> been set? Instead of failing? Or maybe that's just overcomplicating
> things when trying to be user-friendly.
I don't think that it's worth adding code for such a feature. Because I believe
there are not many users who enable FPW on-the-fly for standby-only backup
and use such a feature.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2011-09-26 12:29:46 | Re: TABLE tab completion |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-09-26 12:06:10 | Re: Support UTF-8 files with BOM in COPY FROM |