On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Would it make sense for pg_start_backup() to have the ability to wait
> for the next restartpoint in a case like this, if we know that FPW has
> been set? Instead of failing? Or maybe that's just overcomplicating
> things when trying to be user-friendly.
I don't think that it's worth adding code for such a feature. Because I believe
there are not many users who enable FPW on-the-fly for standby-only backup
and use such a feature.
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: David Fetter||Date: 2011-09-26 12:29:46|
|Subject: Re: TABLE tab completion|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2011-09-26 12:06:10|
|Subject: Re: Support UTF-8 files with BOM in COPY FROM|