Re: hardware advice

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: hardware advice
Date: 2012-09-27 21:16:29
Message-ID: CAGTBQpaT6=4hJadHWuLzQ=JeBTXLE_8_oFB4P42NVKXvqmC0kg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:08 PM, David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> We went from Dunnington to Nehalem, and it was stunning how much better
>> the X5675 was compared to the E7450. Sandy Bridge isn't quite that much of a
>> jump though, so if you don't need that kind of bleeding-edge, you might be
>> able to save some cash. This is especially true since the E5-2600 series has
>> the same TDP profile and both use 32nm lithography.
>
> We use Opteron on a price/performance basis. Intel always seems to come up
> with some way to make their low-cost processors useless (such as limiting
> the amount of memory they can address).

Careful with AMD, since many (I'm not sure about the latest ones)
cannot saturate the memory bus when running single-threaded. So, great
if you have a high concurrent workload, quite bad if you don't.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alan Hodgson 2012-09-27 21:17:57 Re: hardware advice
Previous Message Evgeny Shishkin 2012-09-27 21:08:46 Re: hardware advice