Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Linux memory zone reclaim

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John Lister <john(dot)lister(at)kickstone(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Linux memory zone reclaim
Date: 2012-07-24 22:05:56
Message-ID: CAGTBQpZPHdzudWgbTC76=32g_mXTeOSetw50djjnQMimmFKohg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:23 PM, John Lister <john(dot)lister(at)kickstone(dot)com> wrote:
> Cheers, I'll give it a go, I wonder if this is likely to be integrated into
> the main code? As has been mentioned here before, postgresql isn't as badly
> affected as mysql for example, but I'm wondering if the trend to larger
> memory and more cores/nodes means it should be offered as an option?
> Although saying that I've read that 10Gb of shared buffers may be enough
> even in big machines 128+Gb ram..
>
> Thoughts?

The attached (better) patch builds and doesn't crash at least.
Which is always good.

Configure with --with-numa

Attachment: numa.patch
Description: application/octet-stream (3.6 KB)

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Aleksei ArefjevDate: 2012-07-25 06:52:35
Subject: Re: transactions start time
Previous:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2012-07-24 21:57:21
Subject: Re: Linux memory zone reclaim

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group