Re: json api WIP patch

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: json api WIP patch
Date: 2013-01-04 20:36:07
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDuqU-H8Y5PYYF1_a3TFvLCXMW4tiJMwfGpb1wzvcvHaw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello

2013/1/4 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:
>
> On 01/02/2013 05:51 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/02/2013 04:45 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here is a patch for the first part of the JSON API that was recently
>>>> discussed. It includes the json parser hook infrastructure and
>>>> functions
>>>> for json_get and friends, plus json_keys.
>
>
>
> Udated patch that contains most of the functionality I'm after. One piece
> left is populate_recordset (populate a set of records from a single json
> datum which is an array of objects, in one pass). That requires a bit of
> thought.
>
> I hope most of the whitespace issues are fixed.
>

it is looking well

I have one note - is it "json_each" good name?

Regards

Pavel

> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-01-04 20:51:54 Re: json api WIP patch
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2013-01-04 20:26:12 Re: dynamic SQL - possible performance regression in 9.2