Hello
2011/11/24 Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>:
> Occasionally, we get bitten by embedded NUL bytes in TEXT values. We
> take care of generating proper UTF-8, but this additional restriction
> sometimes slips by. It would be really helpful if PostgreSQL could
> store such TEXT fields as-is (at least if they are computed internally,
> or come from query parameters).
>
and why you don't use bytea ? Text should be correct literal.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
> I haven't even looked how difficult it would be to implement this. Do
> you think it's worth the trouble?
>
> --
> Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>
> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
> Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1
> D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Boszormenyi Zoltan | Date: 2011-11-24 09:24:09 |
| Subject: Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64 |
| Previous: | From: Florian Weimer | Date: 2011-11-24 09:06:43 |
| Subject: Making TEXT NUL-transparent |