Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelínek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Subject: Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Date: 2012-02-28 20:41:13
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDA=bzYnmKVfG6=ogYPa0EJCsYF5E-8OUBFMkrkvHTFHQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2012/2/28 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
>
> Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of mar feb 28 16:30:58 -0300 2012:
>
>> I refreshed patch for current git repository.
>
> Thanks, I'll have a look.
>
> Oh, another thing -- you shouldn't patch the 1.0 version of the plpgsql
> extension.  Rather I think you should produce a 1.1 version.
>

there is patch with updated tag. I am not sure if there are some
changes in pg_upgrade are necessary??

Regards and thank you

Pavel

> --
> Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

Attachment Content-Type Size
check_function-2012-02-28-3.diff.gz application/x-gzip 29.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-02-28 20:44:02 Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-02-28 19:42:22 Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement