> Yeah. I think it would be a good idea for UPDATE and DELETE to expose
> a LIMIT option, but I can't really see the virtue in making that
> functionality available only through SPI.
I don't agree - LIMIT after UPDATE or DELETE has no sense. Clean
solution should be based on using updateable CTE.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Geoghegan||Date: 2012-04-14 03:21:44|
|Subject: Re: Patch: add timing of buffer I/O requests|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-04-14 02:01:16|
|Subject: Re: Patch: add timing of buffer I/O requests |
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-04-14 04:21:22|
|Subject: Re: BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus|
|Previous:||From: John R Pierce||Date: 2012-04-14 01:53:26|
|Subject: Re: BUG #6587: Limit on a query is mis-documented|