Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelínek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Subject: Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Date: 2012-02-28 21:27:51
Message-ID: CAFj8pRD-sTzsjM77bXCfCqK4gnXO8p1G1yY4ErtqQWC3AVcocg@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2012/2/28 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
>
>
> In gram.y we have a new check_option_list nonterminal.  This is mostly
> identical to explain_option_list, except that the option args do not
> take a NumericOnly (only opt_boolean_or_string and empty).  I wonder if
> it's really worthwhile having a bunch of separate productions for this;
> how about we just use the existing explain_option_list instead and get
> rid of those extra productions?

I have to look on it

>
> elog() is used in many user-facing messages (errors and notices).  Full
> ereport() calls should be used there, so that messages are marked for
> translations and so on.

yes, I'll fix it

>
> Does the patched pg_dump work with older servers?
>

yes, It should to do

> I don't like CheckFunction being declared in defrem.h.  It seems
> completely out of place there.  I don't see any better place though, so
> I'm thinking maybe we should have a new header file for it (say
> commands/functions.h; but we already have executor/functions.h so
> perhaps it's better to find another name).  This addition means that
> there's a distressingly large number of .c files that are now getting
> dest.h, which was previously pretty confined.
>

you have much better knowledge about headers then me, so, please,
propose solution.

Regards

Pavel


> --
> Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2012-02-28 22:20:55
Subject: Re: NULL's support in SP-GiST
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2012-02-28 21:20:54
Subject: Re: strange plan - PostgreSQL 9.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group