2012/2/28 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> In gram.y we have a new check_option_list nonterminal. This is mostly
> identical to explain_option_list, except that the option args do not
> take a NumericOnly (only opt_boolean_or_string and empty). I wonder if
> it's really worthwhile having a bunch of separate productions for this;
> how about we just use the existing explain_option_list instead and get
> rid of those extra productions?
I have to look on it
> elog() is used in many user-facing messages (errors and notices). Full
> ereport() calls should be used there, so that messages are marked for
> translations and so on.
yes, I'll fix it
> Does the patched pg_dump work with older servers?
yes, It should to do
> I don't like CheckFunction being declared in defrem.h. It seems
> completely out of place there. I don't see any better place though, so
> I'm thinking maybe we should have a new header file for it (say
> commands/functions.h; but we already have executor/functions.h so
> perhaps it's better to find another name). This addition means that
> there's a distressingly large number of .c files that are now getting
> dest.h, which was previously pretty confined.
you have much better knowledge about headers then me, so, please,
> Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jaime Casanova||Date: 2012-02-28 22:20:55|
|Subject: Re: NULL's support in SP-GiST|
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2012-02-28 21:20:54|
|Subject: Re: strange plan - PostgreSQL 9.2|