Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Date: 2011-09-19 20:50:54
Message-ID: CAFj8pRC4WM8CVEux28iyTH32WcCP==jPkfVGgoFuv8OEMQ8kbw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/9/19 Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> On 09/19/2011 10:58 AM, Joe Abbate wrote:
>>
>> Maybe it's time for an open source SQL standard, one not controlled by
>> the "big guys" and their IP claims.
>>
>
> Not spending as much time sitting in meetings and fighting with other
> vendors is one of the competitive advantages PostgreSQL development has vs.
> the "big guys".  There needs to be a pretty serious problem with your
> process before adding bureaucracy to it is anything but a backwards move.
>  And standardization tends to attract lots of paperwork.  Last thing you
> want to be competing with a big company on is doing that sort of big company
> work.

+1 :)

Pavel

>
> --
> Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com   Baltimore, MD
> PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support  www.2ndQuadrant.us
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Abbate 2011-09-19 21:20:17 Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Previous Message Greg Smith 2011-09-19 20:44:17 Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?