2012/1/11 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I understand it now. My opinion is so some operators and index search
>> can be in 9.2 - so use a JSON just as communication format now.
>> * we need to build JSON
>> * we need to check if some is valid JSON
>> * we need to store JSON
>> other steps should be (9.2)
>> * basic operators eq, neeq
>> * some tool like XQuery - simple query on JSON document available from
>> SQL that can be used for functional indexes.
> That would be nice, but let's not let the perfect be the enemy of the
> good. We don't have a lot of time here.
sorry - replace 9.2 by 9.3 - I am sorry
I am able to write array_to_json fce and Andrew can write query_to_json
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Misa Simic||Date: 2012-01-11 17:10:53|
|Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2012-01-11 15:20:24|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Send new protocol keepalive messages to