Re: proposal: disallow operator "=>" and use it for named parameters

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: disallow operator "=>" and use it for named parameters
Date: 2015-01-19 16:14:05
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBKc0c2uKOnuetxLWFRrEbDkcu=11qL7B7bM4uqxrR=Rg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-01-19 14:27 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> I think you should just remove the WARNING, not change it to an error.
> >> If somebody wants to quote the operator name to be able to continue
> >> using it, I think that's OK.
> >
> > It looks so quoting doesn't help here
> >
> > + CREATE OPERATOR "=>" (
> > + leftarg = int8,<--><------>-- right unary
> > + procedure = numeric_fac
> > + );
> > + ERROR: syntax error at or near "("
> > + LINE 1: CREATE OPERATOR "=>" (
> > + ^
>
> Well then the error check is just dead code. Either way, you don't need
> it.
>

yes, I removed it

Regards

Pavel

>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
ansi-sql-named-parameters-02.patch text/x-patch 11.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-01-19 16:16:09 Re: Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout during buildfarm runs?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-01-19 16:09:34 Re: [PATCH] explain sortorder