2013/1/16 Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>:
> * Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
>> I am not sure how a COPY could be easily parallelized, but I supposed it
>> could be done as part of the 1GB segment feature. People have
>> complained that COPY is CPU-bound, so it might be very interesting to
>> see if we could offload some of that parsing overhead to a child.
> COPY can certainly be CPU bound but before we can parallelize that
> usefully we need to solve the problem around extent locking when trying
> to do multiple COPY's to the same table.
Probably update any related indexes and constraint checking should be
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dimitri Fontaine||Date: 2013-01-16 21:16:03|
|Subject: Re: Event Triggers: adding information|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2013-01-16 20:45:46|
|Subject: Re: CF3+4|