can you look, please, on updated version - it respects Tom's proposal
and it is significantly reduced?
2013/1/28 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2013/1/26 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>> +1. This looks quite nifty. Maybe useful too to have a default prefix
>>> via some setting.
>> Meh. I would expect that "\gset :foo" would work to specify a computed
>> prefix if you wanted it --- isn't that sufficient indirection? I'm not
>> thrilled with further expanding the set of magic variables in psql.
> here is patch related to your proposal
>> regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2013-02-01 05:37:39|
|Subject: Re: Re: proposal: a width specification for s specifier
(format function), fix behave when positional and ordered placeholders are used|
|Previous:||From: Amit Kapila||Date: 2013-02-01 05:04:33|
|Subject: Re: Suggestion: Issue warning when calling SET TRANSACTION outside transaction block|