| From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: VALID UNTIL |
| Date: | 2012-03-15 00:40:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAFcNs+qCG5h0+Wfx=CrudfYbk9HunNTLOiMTVWN5xhjNUcFPgA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2012/3/14 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
>
> Why would you confine it to verbose mode?
Because I did not want to change the current behavior of this psql
command... but...
For most people it won't
> matter, but for people who are using the feature, it seems like
> important information. Per the OP's complaint, it's particularly
> important for those who have forgotten they're using the feature
> (and hence would not think to specify "+" ...)
>
>
You' re right, then I attached a new patch with your suggestion.
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| psql_describe_role_add_valid_until.patch | text/x-patch | 3.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-03-15 01:17:33 | Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-03-15 00:26:06 | Re: pg_upgrade and statistics |