On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 21:30, Nikhil Sontakke <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> I guess we both are in agreement with each other :)
>
> After sleeping over it, I think that check is indeed dead code with this new
> non-inheritable check constraints functionality in place. So unless you have
> some other comments, we can mark this as 'Ready for Commiter'.
>
> Again, thanks for the thorough review and subsequent changes!

PFA an updated patch with the check removed and a comment or two added.

I've also marked it ready.

In response to

• Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints at 2011-10-08 03:30:51 from Nikhil Sontakke

Responses

• Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints at 2011-12-04 02:14:20 from Alvaro Herrera

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Florian Pflug	Date: 2011-10-09 10:45:08
	Subject: Re: libpq, PQdescribePrepared -> PQftype, PQfmod, no PQnullable
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2011-10-09 04:34:26
	Subject: Re: Intermittent regression test failure from index-only scans patch