Re: leakproof

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: leakproof
Date: 2012-02-27 22:49:18
Message-ID: CAFNqd5WbkYwYePww7N_qAjy0i7y_pfcZNJ9ci__NNvZK=w7snw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:50 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2012, at 4:53 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>>> I also liked Kevin's suggestion of DISCREET
>>
>> That would probably create too much confusion with "discrete".
>
> SECRETE?

BOUND? GAGGED?
--
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-02-27 22:51:49 Re: default values in inheritance hierarchies
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2012-02-27 22:49:04 Re: How to know a table has been modified?