Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: leakproof

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: leakproof
Date: 2012-02-27 22:49:18
Message-ID: CAFNqd5WbkYwYePww7N_qAjy0i7y_pfcZNJ9ci__NNvZK=w7snw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:50 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2012, at 4:53 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>>> I also liked Kevin's suggestion of DISCREET
>>
>> That would probably create too much confusion with "discrete".
>
> SECRETE?

BOUND?  GAGGED?
-- 
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-02-27 22:51:49
Subject: Re: default values in inheritance hierarchies
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2012-02-27 22:49:04
Subject: Re: How to know a table has been modified?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group