Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Using Different Ports for Multiple PosgreSQL Installations: Any Issues?

From: Tom Browder <tom(dot)browder(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Ye Chuah <yechuah(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using Different Ports for Multiple PosgreSQL Installations: Any Issues?
Date: 2012-10-01 20:00:53
Message-ID: CAFMGiz9f0y8R5FpfEVVzYOAwQpQA9bdrKj6Yj_Va1wNHTaOJMA@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:56:24AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Ye Chuah <yechuah(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > I run multiple instances of postgres on unix sockets without any
>> > problems. Do you have to use a port? If not, just use the sockets.
>>
>> Hm, I need remote access so I think I have to use a port, correct?
...
> FYI, the postgresql.conf port setting actually controls the TCP port and
> is embedded in the unix domain socket name, so port really controls
> both.

Thanks, Bruce.

Best,

-Tom


In response to

Responses

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Dominik MoritzDate: 2012-10-01 22:47:05
Subject: check if type is valid pg type
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-10-01 16:40:59
Subject: Re: Using Different Ports for Multiple PosgreSQL Installations: Any Issues?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group