From: | the6campbells <the6campbells(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: When will your JDBC 4.0 driver implement DatabaseMetadata.getFunctions? |
Date: | 2012-09-24 17:49:46 |
Message-ID: | CAFEjsq6_=7wLDDmKGMFv2du2VxEumais5St+89S9AJJ8y0jpAQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Semantically, one would hope that the advertised method is used to get an
object of the type (procedure vs function) vs using an overloaded method
which conceptually is returning both. Perhaps PG may internally treat both
objects as the same type but you'd like to think that one could say create
procedure and create function and be able locate said via canonical API
method such as DatabaseMetadata.get<xxyyzz>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
> This is just an alias for getProcedures, so 1) it's probably fairly
> easy to implement and 2) why not just use getProcedures ?
> Dave Cramer
>
> dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
> http://www.credativ.ca
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:59 PM, the6campbells <the6campbells(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Currently fails
> >
> > PostgreSQL 9.1 JDBC4 (build 902)
> > 9.0.4
> >
> > Error calling JDBC driver for procedure metadata.
> > org.postgresql.Driver.notImplemented(Driver.java:751)
> >
> org.postgresql.jdbc4.AbstractJdbc4DatabaseMetaData.getFunctions(AbstractJdbc4DatabaseMetaData.java:82)
> > SQLException.sqlState(0A000) SQLException.Message(Method
> > org.postgresql.jdbc4.Jdbc4DatabaseMetaData.getFunction(String, String,
> > String) is not yet implemented.)
> >
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-24 18:33:47 | Re: Bug in AbstracJdbc2Statement.replaceProcessing when using dollar quoting? |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2012-09-24 17:35:28 | Re: When will your JDBC 4.0 driver implement DatabaseMetadata.getFunctions? |