| From: | Florent Guillaume <fg(at)nuxeo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | DocSea - Patrice Delorme <pdelorme(at)docsea(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal |
| Date: | 2012-09-12 13:35:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAF-4BpPTHo3zXV_hk8Yy_3MHrz2c5KUeeohyzjjVzUHuFtOF3A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> DocSea - Patrice Delorme <pdelorme(at)docsea(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> It is impossible to fetch data when numeric value in database is
>> NaN
>> It throws FAST_NUMBER_FAILED
>> (postgresql-jdbc-9.1-902:AbstractJdbc2ResultSet:2176) because my
>> value is not numeric (NaN).
>> This is incorect behaviour since 'NaN' is a legal value in
>> postgres for numeric type.
>
> How do you expect what you read to be represented in Java?
java.lang.Double.NaN I guess.
--
Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo
Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Johnston | 2012-09-12 14:15:24 | Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2012-09-12 11:33:33 | Re: send/receive buffer size |