From: | Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Aleksander Rozman <andy(dot)rozman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: problem after upgrade db missing |
Date: | 2012-06-06 15:01:24 |
Message-ID: | CAF-3MvOXfyDvyTZPwb+xCe2eVKtiFx_5EueDh=ewSOJ8niheVw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 5 June 2012 23:51, Aleksander Rozman <andy(dot)rozman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Like I said before all databases were missing... One of thoose database was
> very important, but since I didn't have time I didn't pursue it further.
If it was very important, that means that you have backups, right?
>From the other replies it seems that you really did lose the
database(s), in which case your backups are pretty much your only
option for recovery...
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-06 15:49:47 | Re: pg_database_size differs from df -s |
Previous Message | Manoj Govindassamy | 2012-06-06 14:55:15 | Postgres 9.1 Synchronous Replication and stuck queries during sync repl setup |