| From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.5 release notes |
| Date: | 2015-06-14 11:05:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAEZATCUNO34g4pdx3nvW_qf0FDQ=R9oB8J5Cz6KA9GqzXZxtNQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11 June 2015 at 05:15, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
> the output here:
>
> http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
>
I think it's worth mentioning
dcbf5948e12aa60b4d6ab65b6445897dfc971e01, probably under "General
Performance". It's an optimisation, and also a user-visible change to
the way LEAKPROOF works. Perhaps something like
Allow pushdown of non-leakproof functions into security barrier views
if the function is not passed any arguments from the view.
Previously only functions marked as LEAKPROOF could be pushed down
into security barrier views.
Regards,
Dean
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2015-06-14 11:31:26 | Re: Problem with CREATE TABLE ... (LIKE ... INCLUDING INDEXES) |
| Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2015-06-14 10:46:39 | CREATE FUNCTION .. LEAKPROOF docs |