On 28 June 2012 19:55, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> You think it will confuse users less if we start telling them to use
>> something that we have a very long history of telling them not to use?
> I don't buy this line of reasoning at all. If we're going to rename
> the GUC, it should be for accuracy, not PR value. If we start
> renaming something every time we improve it, we're going to go nuts.
> We improved lots of things in 9.2; they didn't all get renamed.
That is a false equivalence, and you know it.
Who said anything about PR value? I'm concerned with not confusing users.
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-06-28 19:00:06|
|Subject: Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-06-28 18:55:29|
|Subject: Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay +
commit_siblings (sort of)|