On 1 October 2012 14:05, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Browning <db(at)kavod(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm wondering if there are any technical/standards constraints that
> are behind the fencing behavior. If there aren't any, maybe an opt-in
> keyword might do the trick -- WITH UNBOXED foo AS (..)?
I may be mistaken, but I think that the fence is described in the SQL standard.
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2012-10-01 13:19:35|
|Subject: Re: embedded list v3|
|Previous:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2012-10-01 13:05:18|
|Subject: Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?|