On 1 October 2012 14:05, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Browning <db(at)kavod(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm wondering if there are any technical/standards constraints that
> are behind the fencing behavior.  If there aren't any, maybe an opt-in
> keyword might do the trick -- WITH UNBOXED foo AS (..)?

I may be mistaken, but I think that the fence is described in the SQL standard.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

• Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list? at 2012-10-01 13:05:18 from Merlin Moncure

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Peter Eisentraut	Date: 2012-10-01 13:19:35
	Subject: Re: embedded list v3
Previous:	From: Merlin Moncure	Date: 2012-10-01 13:05:18
	Subject: Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?