Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Deprecating RULES

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Deprecating RULES
Date: 2012-10-12 19:10:18
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 12 October 2012 20:01, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> We know that rules are a bad fit for
> almost everything, *but we can't assume that our users all know that
> when it isn't even documented*.

I agree that we should document that rules are something that should
almost certainly be avoided. Up until recently, the advice surrounding
commit_delay in the docs said something practically indistinguishable
from "you don't want to use this". Why not do the same for rules?

Peter Geoghegan
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2012-10-12 19:17:28
Subject: Re: Truncate if exists
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-10-12 19:07:18
Subject: Re: September 2012 commitfest

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group