Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: Revert "commit_delay" change; just add comment that we don't hav

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Revert "commit_delay" change; just add comment that we don't hav
Date: 2012-08-15 01:22:05
Message-ID: CAEYLb_VL89Mp9yZ5dph2i8OijdXZGLH_kCEGzHwO=RWoe3Kdmw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
On 14 August 2012 21:26, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Revert "commit_delay" change; just add comment that we don't have
> a microsecond specification.

I think that if we eventually decide to change the name of
commit_delay for 9.3 (you previously suggested that that might be
revisited), it will be reasonable to have the new GUC in units of
milliseconds. After all, we've already been switching to milliseconds
across various statistics views, including pg_stat_statements.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2012-08-15 02:57:08
Subject: Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2012-08-14 23:19:25
Subject: Re: superusers are members of all roles?

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2012-08-15 03:21:30
Subject: pgsql: Add doc example of restricting large object trigger firing toon
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-08-14 22:49:15
Subject: pgsql: Stamp 8.3.20.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group