On 14 August 2012 21:26, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Revert "commit_delay" change; just add comment that we don't have
> a microsecond specification.

I think that if we eventually decide to change the name of
commit_delay for 9.3 (you previously suggested that that might be
revisited), it will be reasonable to have the new GUC in units of
milliseconds. After all, we've already been switching to milliseconds
across various statistics views, including pg_stat_statements.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

• pgsql: Revert "commit_delay" change;just add comment that we don't hav at 2012-08-14 20:26:19 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revert "commit_delay" change; just add comment that we don't hav at 2012-08-15 04:15:22 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Peter Eisentraut	Date: 2012-08-15 02:57:08
	Subject: Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
Previous:	From: Andrew Dunstan	Date: 2012-08-14 23:19:25
	Subject: Re: superusers are members of all roles?

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2012-08-15 03:21:30
	Subject: pgsql: Add doc example of restricting large object trigger firing toon
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2012-08-14 22:49:15
	Subject: pgsql: Stamp 8.3.20.