Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ALTER command reworks

From: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER command reworks
Date: 2013-01-15 15:40:29
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2013/1/15 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> Kohei KaiGai escribió:
>> The attached patch is a rebased version towards the latest master
>> branch, and fix up the issue around error messages on name conflicts.
> I assume the lock.c changes are just a bollixed merge, right?
Yes, I'll check it and rebase it.

> I am not sure about some of the changes in the regression test expected
> output; are we really okay with losing the "in schema foo" part in some
> of these cases?
The changes in the expected results in regression test originated from
elimination of getObjectDescription, but "in schema foo" should be kept.
It looks like an obvious my mistake. Sorry.

KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andres FreundDate: 2013-01-15 15:49:22
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v4
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2013-01-15 15:28:28
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group