2011/12/30 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > The Linux kernel does this (arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc-opcode.h):
> Yeah, I was looking at that too.
> > We can't copy-paste code from Linux directly, and I'm not sure I like
> > that particular phrasing of the macro, but perhaps we should steal the
> > idea and only use the hint on 64-bit PowerPC processors?
> The info that I've found says that the hint exists beginning in POWER6,
> and there were certainly 64-bit Power machines before that. However,
> it might be that the only machines that actually spit up on the hint bit
> (rather than ignore it) were 32-bit, in which case this would be a
> usable heuristic. Not sure how we can research that ... do we want to
> just assume the kernel guys know what they're doing?
I'm a bit confused and might miss the point, but...
If we can decide whether to use the hint operand when we build
postgres, I think it's better to check if we can compile and run
a sample code with lwarx hint operand than to refer to some
arbitrary defines, such as FOO_PPC64 or something.
I still wonder when to judge the hint availability, compile time
I don't have any idea how to decide that on runtime, though.
I changed the subject since it's no longer related to HPUX.
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jean-Yves F. Barbier||Date: 2011-12-30 06:34:28|
|Subject: Re: index refuses to build [finally SOLVED, but still some
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-12-30 03:40:19|
|Subject: Re: [NOVICE] index refuses to build |