Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 9.2 driver

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.2 driver
Date: 2012-09-12 09:03:07
Message-ID: CADK3HHL=vEfG8eZOc7_b+Q8gxGizgK=Tho6+PTnYxY3wb3TePQ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Devrim

I haven't verified it but was in the process right now but there
should be no reason why the driver will not work on 9.2.

Give me a few days, I will push a release out?

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca


On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 04:53 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> We actually have never followed the release of the server, but I'm
>> getting the sense now that people want a version specifically labelled
>> 9.2 ?
>
> Well, does 9.1 driver work on 9.2 w/o any issues? If so, I can push that
> driver, too.
>
> But yes, people look for a specific label.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Devrim GÜNDÜZ
> Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
> Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
> http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz


In response to

Responses

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Mike FowlerDate: 2012-09-12 09:15:48
Subject: Re: 9.2 driver
Previous:From: DocSea - Patrice DelormeDate: 2012-09-12 09:00:03
Subject: Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group