I haven't verified it but was in the process right now but there
should be no reason why the driver will not work on 9.2.
Give me a few days, I will push a release out?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 04:53 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> We actually have never followed the release of the server, but I'm
>> getting the sense now that people want a version specifically labelled
>> 9.2 ?
> Well, does 9.1 driver work on 9.2 w/o any issues? If so, I can push that
> driver, too.
> But yes, people look for a specific label.
> Devrim GÜNDÜZ
> Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
> Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
> http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Mike Fowler||Date: 2012-09-12 09:15:48|
|Subject: Re: 9.2 driver|
|Previous:||From: DocSea - Patrice Delorme||Date: 2012-09-12 09:00:03|
|Subject: Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal|