From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | dbadmin(at)nqadmin(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 9.1 JDBC 4 driver |
Date: | 2012-04-25 20:59:43 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HHKoOe8LCDFmBxd354EJnt-SneMSbeATS0qUE_PosfhkGg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Ok,
I have tagged 902 and uploaded a jar to jdbc.postgresql.jar and
updated the download page
Please let me know if there are any issues with this jar.
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Prasanth Reddy <dbadmin(at)nqadmin(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The fix seems to coincide with the stack trace location of mine. But in the fix added, the long value seems to be casted to int again. Wouldn't this cause problem when the value of oid has exceeded
> the int range of java? Why not use long data type for table and column variable?
>
> It would be great if we can get a new jar with the fix.
>
> Thanks,
> Prasanth
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Prasanth Reddy <dbadmin(at)nqadmin(dot)com> wrote:
>> We have been using 8.4 jdbc3 driver. Recently we have upgraded it to 9.1-901 JDBC 4 jar. I am getting an error message (org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: Bad value for type int : 2618079772) while
>> updating some columns. The column I am updating is a date column and I am using updateDate function of the rowset. Did some google search and found a really old post
>> (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2007-03/msg00029.php) that talked about oid being returned as Integer and causing this problem when the oid is too big. Below I am including the stack trace.
>>
>> I have reverted to 8.4 jdbc3 driver and the same code works fine. So is this a bug in jdbc4?
>
> The follow-up to the post you linked suggests that the issue had been
> fixed at the time, so it may be a different manifestation of the same
> thing, but a similar-looking bug was recently fixed in git:
>
> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/commit/4d60ea616eff61262721176db6e77819a23f6dc2
>
> As far as I can tell, though, there are no official builds available
> that include this fix yet, so you would have to build from source
> (although given that this is a fairly serious issue *if* it does bite
> you, perhaps it's time for another release?)
> ---
> Maciek Sakrejda | System Architect | Truviso
>
> 1065 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 215
> Foster City, CA 94404
> (650) 242-3500 Main
> www.truviso.com
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2012-04-25 23:59:53 | Re: 9.1 JDBC 4 driver |
Previous Message | Prasanth Reddy | 2012-04-25 20:34:54 | Re: 9.1 JDBC 4 driver |