Re: send/receive buffer size

So one of the problems with github is that there is no way to send
email to the list. Unless everyone that is on the list now "watches"
pgjdbc on github they don't get notifications.

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au> wrote:
> On 08/25/2012 04:45 AM, Shijun Kong wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible to establish a better issue tracking system than this
>> static http://jdbc.postgresql.org/todo.html or mailing list?
>
>
> +1
>
> The -BUGS list works ok for the main project because there are enough people
> with the time and expertise to promptly act on issues. Even then things slip
> through the cracks quite a bit. It seems it hasn't been working great for
> PgJDBC.
>
>
>
>> Since the project is hosted on github now. Why not leverage it's
>> build-in features? https://github.com/features/projects/issues
>
> Also very much +1 from me, if Dave's OK adding more people to the PgJDBC org
> membership list.
>
> GitHub provides facilities canned and ready to use, including a simple issue
> tracker, wiki, and patch tracking system. At least for the purpose of
> catching up on the backlog and finding missed patches it seems wise to use
> it. Since Pg proper doesn't use a tracker, and one appears to be necessary
> at least for catch-up, I'd suggest using that one.
>
>
> Re catch-up:
>
> The first thing to do will be find all messages with patch attachments. For
> that it'd be quite handy to have a dump of the last year or two's archives.
> I can manually download the mbox files, but ... since the list manager
> supports full text search, surely it's in a database too?
>
> How're the chances of getting a DB dump of the PgJDBC list for the last
> couple of years? I'll ask on pgsql-web .
>
> --
> Craig Ringer