On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> But your patch hasn't got rid of them, and so it's declared twice. There is
> no pgpipe.h, BTW, it's declared in port.h. If VC2005 doesn't complain about
> the double declaration then that's a bug in the compiler, IMNSHO. Doesn't it
> even issue a warning? I no longer use VC2005 for anything, BTW, I use VC2008
> or later.
I agree, the compiler should have found it, but no, I don't even get a
warning. I just verified it and when I add a #error right after the
prototypes in port.h then it hits the #error on every file, so it
definitely sees both prototypes and doesn't complain... cl.exe is
running with /W3.
> Anyway, ISTM the best thing is just for us to get rid of pgpipe without
> further ado. I'll try to get a patch together for that.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Joachim Wieland||Date: 2012-03-29 01:54:53|
|Subject: Re: patch for parallel pg_dump|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-03-29 01:09:41|
|Subject: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) |