Re: patch for parallel pg_dump

From: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
Date: 2012-03-29 00:28:54
Message-ID: CACw0+10jHnkSxJZmpM2AP=_KqsCy2n1h7TzsMk0z8YMmViZw4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> First hurdle: It doesn't build under Windows/mingw-w64:
>
>   parallel.c:40:12: error: static declaration of 'pgpipe' follows
>   non-static declaration

Strange, I'm not seeing this but I'm building with VC2005. What
happens is that you're pulling in the pgpipe.h header. I have moved
these functions as static functions into pg_dump since you voted for
removing them from the other location (because as it turned out,
nobody else is currently using them).

Joachim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2012-03-29 00:43:23 Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2012-03-28 23:52:23 Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)