Re: Using Different Ports for Multiple PosgreSQL Installations: Any Issues?

From: Andrej <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Browder <tom(dot)browder(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using Different Ports for Multiple PosgreSQL Installations: Any Issues?
Date: 2012-10-04 00:31:22
Message-ID: CACMx3pNyMmum5uq8Bq3NgNYtRBuy4wvyguE+XHqR0XKhuMeGDA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

On 2 October 2012 09:00, Tom Browder <tom(dot)browder(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> FYI, the postgresql.conf port setting actually controls the TCP port and
>> is embedded in the unix domain socket name, so port really controls
>> both.

> Thanks, Bruce.

As an aside: this is exactly the way postgres package maintainers for Debian/
*buntu tackle the issue of data migrations. Two versions running in
parallel on
different ports.

Cheers,
Andrej

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Romain Billon-Grand 2012-10-07 21:39:00 Posix the tool to use?
Previous Message Raghavendra 2012-10-02 12:06:02 Converting from strings to c data types