Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Let's drop V2 protocol

From: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Let's drop V2 protocol
Date: 2012-02-24 14:40:26
Message-ID: CACMqXCKmCONWb4Qejto+YSg6d3rvcnA7EbQd_E73UodNK6u1qQ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> So could we like, uh, not do it and simply drop the V2 code?
>
> I think it's plausible that very old client libraries could connect to
> a modern server.  But it's pretty unlikely to have a 9.2 app contact
> an ancient server IMO.

We can drop it from libpq but keep  the server-side support,
the codebase is different.

-- 
marko

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter GeogheganDate: 2012-02-24 14:43:14
Subject: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
Previous:From: Yeb HavingaDate: 2012-02-24 14:40:24
Subject: Re: [v9.2] Add GUC sepgsql.client_label

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group