On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> So could we like, uh, not do it and simply drop the V2 code?
> I think it's plausible that very old client libraries could connect to
> a modern server. But it's pretty unlikely to have a 9.2 app contact
> an ancient server IMO.
We can drop it from libpq but keep the server-side support,
the codebase is different.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Geoghegan||Date: 2012-02-24 14:43:14|
|Subject: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive
changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)|
|Previous:||From: Yeb Havinga||Date: 2012-02-24 14:40:24|
|Subject: Re: [v9.2] Add GUC sepgsql.client_label|