On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 01/14/2012 09:12 AM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
>
>> But I must adjust the patch based on the thread comments (basically,
>> numeric output). I have a new patch but need to test it before submitting
>> it.
>> I'll post this weekend.
>>
>
> It's now at https://commitfest.postgresql.**org/action/patch_view?id=776<https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=776>listed as waiting on you right now.  It's good to put patches into the CF
> application early.  Helps planning, and gives a safety net against all
> sorts of things.  We wouldn't want something this obviously useful to get
> kicked out if, for example, you lost your Internet connection over the
> weekend and then didn't technically qualify as having submitted it there
> before the deadline.  As someone who sweated today for two hours when my
> power at home was turned off to install a new circuit breaker, I'm feeling
> particularly paranoid right now about that sort of thing here.
> he patch
> The fact that you got some review feedback before the official CF start
> doesn't mean you can't be listed there right now.  In fact, those are
> things I like to see tracked.  Having links to all of the e-mail messages
> that were important turning points for a feature that changed during review
> is very helpful to reviewers and committers.  And the easiest way to keep
> up with that is to start as early as possible:  add it to the app right
> after the first patch submission.


I agree.

So lets make it easy for the patch submitter to start the process. I
propose that we have a page in the CF application where people can
upload/attach the patch, and the app posts the patch to -hackers and uses
the post URL to create the CF entry.

Regards,
-- 
Gurjeet Singh
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

• Re: xlog location arithmetic at 2012-01-15 01:18:31 from Greg Smith

Responses

• Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic) at 2012-01-15 04:44:08 from Greg Smith

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Greg Smith	Date: 2012-01-15 04:44:08
	Subject: Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic)
Previous:	From: Greg Smith	Date: 2012-01-15 01:58:11
	Subject: Re: Why is CF 2011-11 still listed as "In Progress"?