On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>> I have updated the commitfest submission to link to the correct patch
>> email.
>>
>>
> Thanks Gurjeet.
>
>
>>  I initially thought that this patch deserves accompanying documentation
>> because pg_dump's serializable transaction may error out because of a
>> conflict. But the following line in the docs [1] confirms otherwise:
>>
>> "read-only transactions will never have serialization conflicts"
>>
>> So no doc patch necessary :)
>>
>>
> Can you please mark the patch as "Ready for committer" if you think that
> way ?
>

Done.

-- 
Gurjeet Singh

http://gurjeet.singh.im/

In response to

• Re: pg_dump transaction's read-only mode at 2013-01-16 06:21:32 from Pavan Deolasee

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Andrew Dunstan	Date: 2013-01-16 14:05:39
	Subject: Re: Parallel query execution
Previous:	From: Stephen Frost	Date: 2013-01-16 14:02:45
	Subject: Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)