Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Reporting hba lines

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reporting hba lines
Date: 2012-06-29 11:28:40
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> cases where people are modifying the wrong hba file.  Can we show
>>> the source text of the hba line?
>> We don't currently keep the full source text around - but we certainly
>> could do that if we wanted to.
> If we're concerned about providing a message like this, I think it'd be
> well worthwhile.  We presumably would only store the active lines not
> comment lines, so the extra memory space would be negligible in just
> about any real use-case.

Turned out to be a bit more work than I thought, since the current
parser reads pg_hba byte by byte, and not line by line. So I had to
change that. See attached, seems reasonable?

 Magnus Hagander

Attachment: hba_line2.patch
Description: application/octet-stream (12.8 KB)

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Boszormenyi ZoltanDate: 2012-06-29 12:43:49
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2012-06-29 10:22:18
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_basebackup blocking all queries with horrible performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group