On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 16:37, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> (2011/10/25 19:15), Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> I have not looked at the code itself, but I wonder if we shouldn't
>>> consider making this a part of core-proper, not just a contrib module.
>>> The fact that it isn't *already* available in core surprises a lot of
>> Do you mean that pgsql_fdw should be a built-in extension like plpgsql
>> so that it's available just after initdb?
> If that was what he meant, I'd vote against it. There are way too many
> people who will *not* want their databases configured to be able to
> reach out onto the net. This feature should be something that has to be
> installed by explicit user action.
That is not what I meant.
I meant installed the shared library by defualt, but still require
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2011-10-26 17:09:34|
|Subject: Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load|
|Previous:||From: Jeff Davis||Date: 2011-10-26 16:47:05|
|Subject: Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor|